# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GLM-4.5V

> GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-glm-4-5v
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-4.5V leads 27.4 to 19.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 59.8% for GLM-4.5V.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 39.8 |
| Rank | 206 | 158 |
| Context | — | 64K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1347 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)
- GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 59.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1334 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1354 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)
- GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1353 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)
- GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1336 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)
- GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1311 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)
- GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1304 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)
- GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1332 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GLM-4.5V better for coding?

GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GLM-4.5V share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.