# Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Gemma 4 31B IT

> Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 31B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3n-e4b-it-vs-gemma-4-31b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 4 31B IT in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 54.0 to 43.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 63.5% for Gemma 4 31B IT.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.12 per million input/output tokens, against $0.09 / $0.34 for Gemma 4 31B IT.
- Gemma 4 31B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 43.2 |
| Rank | 203 | 85 |
| Context | 33K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.06 | $0.09 |
| Output $/M | $0.12 | $0.34 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1459 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1364 |
| SciCode | — | 43.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 925.5 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 26.4 (#119)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 63.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 70.6% |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 53% |
| DTBench | — | 82.7% |
| LMCA | — | 39.3% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 30.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.74 |

## Math

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.3 (#72)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1464 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#141)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1465 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 75.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 10.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.0 (#32)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1278 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 54.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1431 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1436 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1462 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1443 |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.6 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1446 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.7 (#92)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1443 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1452 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1368 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1120 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Gemma 4 31B IT?

Gemma 4 31B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3n E4b IT costs 2.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 31B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3n E4b IT or Gemma 4 31B IT?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 31B IT lists at $0.09 and $0.34.

### Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Gemma 4 31B IT better for coding?

Gemma 4 31B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 31B IT does, with 262K tokens against 33K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Gemma 4 31B IT share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 31B IT has 35.