# Gemma 3 4B vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 7.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Trinity Large Thinking's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Trinity Large Thinking in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 40.9 to 11.8.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.80 for Trinity Large Thinking.
- Trinity Large Thinking accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 326 | 185 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1350 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1360 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1325 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1337 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1373 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 7.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Trinity Large Thinking's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Trinity Large Thinking?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Trinity Large Thinking lists at $0.25 and $0.80.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Trinity Large Thinking does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Trinity Large Thinking share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.