# Gemma 3 4B vs Solar Pro4

> Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-solar-pro4
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Solar Pro4 leads 39.8 to 11.8.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for Solar Pro4.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 42.1 |
| Rank | 326 | 121 |
| Context | 131K | 524K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
- Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
- Solar Pro4: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
- Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
- Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1416 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
- Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1427 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
- Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1361 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1364 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1360 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1415 |
| LMArena French | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1401 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
- Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1377 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
- Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
- Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1385 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Solar Pro4?

Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 10× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Solar Pro4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Solar Pro4?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Solar Pro4 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?

Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Solar Pro4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.