# Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

> Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 5.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-qwen3-coder-next
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 22.4 to 13.2.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.12 / $0.80 for Qwen3 Coder Next.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 34.3 |
| Rank | 326 | 232 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.12 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
- Qwen3 Coder Next: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 5.8× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Coder Next's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next lists at $0.12 and $0.80.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.9 vs 36.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.