# Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 9 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 320 | 66 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 50.9% | 84% |
| LMCA | 2.8% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 147.39 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1467 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 4B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1445 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1471 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1457 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1459 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.3 vs 36.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.