# Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.03 / $0.13 for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 320 | 152 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 23% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 144.62 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Flash lists at $0.03 and $0.13.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.