# Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.6 27B

> Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 27× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-qwen3-6-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 27B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 27B.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $3.60 for Qwen3.6 27B.
- Qwen3.6 27B accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 42.2 |
| Rank | 326 | 117 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.60 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $3.60 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 37.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 22% |
| DTBench | 50.9% | 78.1% |
| LMCA | 2.8% | 34.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 146.5 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 7% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 91.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 35.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 85.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
- Qwen3.6 27B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
- Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.6 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1026 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.2 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 27× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 27B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3.6 27B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 27B lists at $0.60 and $3.60.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 27B does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3.6 27B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.