# Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 46.0 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B and 86.7% for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2.40 for Qwen3.5 Plus.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 42.3 |
| Rank | 320 | 103 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 22% |
| DTBench | 50.9% | 80.5% |
| LMCA | 2.8% | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 146.79 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 84.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | 10.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 18× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.5 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3.5 Plus?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5 Plus lists at $0.40 and $2.40.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.