# Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 24× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 21

## Summary

- They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 32B leads 40.0 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B and 66.9% for Qwen3 32B.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3 32B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 320 | 166 |
| Context | 131K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | 54.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1335 |
| DTBench | 50.9% | 67.5% |
| LMCA | 2.8% | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 138.51 |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1399 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1362 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1317 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1311 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1331 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 24× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 32B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 32B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3 32B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 32B better for coding?

Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.3 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 32B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.