# Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3 14B

> Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 14B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.2 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B and 66.4% for Qwen3 14B.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.35 / $1.40 for Qwen3 14B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 35.0 |
| Rank | 320 | 222 |
| Context | 131K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $1.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Qwen3 14B: 36.7 (#191)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Qwen3 14B: 29.4 (#78)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | 41% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.1 (#272)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | 49.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 4% |
| DTBench | 50.9% | 64% |
| LMCA | 2.8% | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 138.23 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.0 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 12× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 14B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 14B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3 14B lists at $0.35 and $1.40.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

Qwen3 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.7 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3 14B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.