# Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 34.9 to 11.8.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 320 | 179 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1314 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1265 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1271 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1299 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.