# Gemma 3 4B vs phi-3-medium 14B

> phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and phi-3-medium 14B in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 27.3 to 16.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 326 | 306 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 121.23 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 27.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than phi-3-medium 14B?

phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.9 vs 36.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and phi-3-medium 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.