# Gemma 3 4B vs Palm 2

> Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-palm-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 5 categories and Palm 2 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 4B leads 42.7 to 21.1.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Google |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 29.4 |
| Rank | 320 | 296 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Palm 2: 28.5 (#306)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 995 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Palm 2: 18.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1005 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Palm 2: 28.4 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1049 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Palm 2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Palm 2: 21.1 (#290)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 916 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 887 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Palm 2: 51.3 (#291)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1010 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Palm 2: 30.7 (#280)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1010 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Palm 2: 25.7 (#299)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Palm 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1027 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 991 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 994 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Palm 2?

Palm 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Palm 2 better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Palm 2 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Palm 2 has 10.