# Gemma 3 4B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 2 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.0 to 11.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 320 | 191 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1292 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1272 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1305 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1294 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1210 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1193 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1252 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.