# Gemma 3 4B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Gemma 3 4B leads 35.9 to 28.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 29.7 |
| Rank | 326 | 304 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.