# Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Small 3.2

> Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Small 3.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-mistral-small-3-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3.2 leads 26.8 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 23.2% for Gemma 3 4B and 49.1% for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0938 / $0.25 for Mistral Small 3.2.
- Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 320 | 271 |
| Context | 131K | 256K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.0938 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 17.5 (#282)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | 40.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 131.73 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 24.9 (#251)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 30.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 26.8 (#249)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 49.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Mistral Small 3.2: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Mistral Small 3.2: 45.1 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Small 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | 1255 |
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Mistral Small 3.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 2.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Small 3.2's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Mistral Small 3.2?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 lists at $0.0938 and $0.25.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.