# Gemma 3 4B vs Mistral Medium 3.1

> Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-mistral-medium-3-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Mistral Medium 3.1 in 1 category; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mistral Medium 3.1 leads 55.6 to 42.2.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $2 for Mistral Medium 3.1.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 31.5 |
| Rank | 320 | 260 |
| Context | 131K | 131K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $2 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 6.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | 1476 |
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Mistral Medium 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 16× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Mistral Medium 3.1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Mistral Medium 3.1?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Mistral Medium 3.1 lists at $0.40 and $2.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.