# Gemma 3 4B vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

> MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-mimo-v2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5-Pro in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2.5-Pro leads 41.5 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 50.9% for Gemma 3 4B and 84.5% for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 44.8 |
| Rank | 320 | 70 |
| Context | 131K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $0.87 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 47.0 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1502 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1477 |
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 899.8 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 25.9 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1487 |
| DTBench | 50.9% | 84.5% |
| LMCA | 2.8% | 29.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 34.4% |
| CritPt | — | 4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 38.6 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1480 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 22% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 41.5 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1501 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 55.3 (#33)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1449 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1450 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1507 |
| LMArena French | — | 1489 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1470 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 77.6 (#21)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1477 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 45.4 (#38)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 65.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1465 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 1440 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | 1493 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1477 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1208 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 11× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.5-Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.5-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or MiMo-V2.5-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.0 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and MiMo-V2.5-Pro share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 27.