# Gemma 3 4B vs Kimi K2.5 Instant

> Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-kimi-k2-5-instant
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 Instant in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 Instant leads 40.2 to 11.8.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 43.6 |
| Rank | 326 | 89 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 42.6 (#97)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1484 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1404 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 29.7 (#90)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1443 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 39.4 (#105)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1442 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1440 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 4B: —
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 40.2 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1254 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 52.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1406 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1413 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1449 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 75.3 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1430 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 43.9 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 1435 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239)
- Kimi K2.5 Instant: 60.6 (#95)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Kimi K2.5 Instant |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1381 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1427 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Kimi K2.5 Instant?

Kimi K2.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Kimi K2.5 Instant better for coding?

Kimi K2.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.6 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Kimi K2.5 Instant share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 Instant has 18.