# Gemma 3 4B vs Hy4 preview

> Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 25× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-hy4-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Hy4 preview leads 54.5 to 15.8.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.83 / $2.50 for Hy4 preview.
- Hy4 preview accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 44.6 |
| Rank | 320 | 73 |
| Context | 131K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $0.83 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Hy4 preview: 51.4 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1633 |
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Hy4 preview: 30.6 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 68.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Hy4 preview: 54.5 (#37)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 75% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Hy4 preview: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hy4 preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Hy4 preview?

Hy4 preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.6 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 25× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy4 preview's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Hy4 preview?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Hy4 preview lists at $0.83 and $2.50.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Hy4 preview better for coding?

Hy4 preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.4 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy4 preview does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Hy4 preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Hy4 preview has 3.