# Gemma 3 4B vs Grok 4.1

> Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-grok-4-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.1 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.1 leads 38.9 to 11.8.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 40.8 |
| Rank | 320 | 135 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Grok 4.1: 33.4 (#246)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1445 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1214 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Grok 4.1: 33.8 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
| Cybench | — | 39% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Grok 4.1: 28.3 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1436 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Grok 4.1: 36.2 (#124)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Grok 4.1: 38.9 (#129)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Grok 4.1: 53.6 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1425 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1447 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1464 |
| LMArena French | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1438 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Grok 4.1: 74.0 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Grok 4.1: 43.2 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Grok 4.1: 62.6 (#71)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Grok 4.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 1411 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1438 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Grok 4.1?

Grok 4.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Grok 4.1 better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Grok 4.1 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 has 19.