# Gemma 3 4B vs Granite 3.1 8b Instruct

> Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-granite-3-1-8b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct in 4 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.1 8b Instruct leads 30.6 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 19.6% for Gemma 3 4B and 27.1% for Granite 3.1 8b Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 320 | 256 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1186 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 23.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | 27.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 21.2 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1146 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.4 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1152 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1142 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1099 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1092 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1145 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.9 (#254)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1131 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1162 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.7 (#261)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1150 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 1129 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1108 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than Granite 3.1 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.1 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3 4B or Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13.