# Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-5.2 Pro

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 1155× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-4b-vs-gpt-5-2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 64.8 to 15.8.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $21 / $168 for GPT-5.2 Pro.
- GPT-5.2 Pro accepts more context: 400K tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 52.2 |
| Rank | 320 | 34 |
| Context | 131K | 400K |
| Input $/M | $0.04 | $21 |
| Output $/M | $0.08 | $168 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 155.41 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 4B better than GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 1155× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.2 Pro's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or GPT-5.2 Pro?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; GPT-5.2 Pro lists at $21 and $168.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.2 Pro does, with 400K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and GPT-5.2 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.