# Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 27B costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-27b-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 26

## Summary

- They share 26 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 9 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 25.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 22.5% for Gemma 3 27B and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Gemma 3 27B is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 277 | 66 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.08 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.16 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 21.2% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 84% |
| LMCA | 12.3% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | 147.39 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | — |
| LiveBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1303 | 1467 |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1165 | 1281 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1368 | 1471 |
| LMArena German | 1362 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1348 | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | 1439 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1454 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1358 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1344 | 1459 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 27B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 27B costs 7.0× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Is Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

26 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.