# Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 27B costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-27b-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 25.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 22.5% for Gemma 3 27B and 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Gemma 3 27B is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $0.19 / $1.13 for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 284 | 182 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.08 | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | $0.16 | $1.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| SciCode | 21.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 20% |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 77.1% |
| LMCA | 12.3% | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | 143.26 |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | — |
| LiveBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1312 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1304 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena French | 1368 | — |
| LMArena German | 1362 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1349 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1345 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 27B better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 27B costs 4.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.6 Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Qwen3.6 Flash?

Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; Qwen3.6 Flash lists at $0.19 and $1.13.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.