# Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2-72B

> Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 29.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-27b-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2-72B in 4 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 27B leads 52.7 to 41.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 74% for Gemma 3 27B and 39.1% for Qwen2-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 277 | 294 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.16 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329)
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1196 |
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| SciCode | 21.2% | — |
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105)
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | 125.27 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | — |
| LMCA | 12.3% | — |
| LiveBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | 39.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1303 | 1171 |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94)
- Qwen2-72B: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1165 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1240 |
| LMArena French | 1368 | 1169 |
| LMArena German | 1362 | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1348 | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155)
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | 1181 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288)
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1193 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161)
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1358 | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1344 | 1195 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 27B better than Qwen2-72B?

Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.5 vs 29.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Gemma 3 27B or Qwen2-72B better for coding?

Qwen2-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.7 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2-72B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.