# Gemma 3 27B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

> Gemma 3 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#277); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-27b-vs-qwen2-5-coder
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | — |
| Rank | 277 | — |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.16 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| SciCode | 21.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | 112.93 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | — |
| LMCA | 12.3% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| LiveBench | 50% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1312 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1303 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1165 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | — |
| LMArena French | 1368 | — |
| LMArena German | 1362 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1348 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1344 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 27B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Gemma 3 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#277); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.