# Gemma 3 27B vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-27b-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 5 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 38.0 to 22.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 277 | 182 |
| Context | 131K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.08 | — |
| Output $/M | $0.16 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1318 |
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| SciCode | 21.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1302 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | — |
| LMCA | 12.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | — |
| LiveBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1315 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1303 | 1272 |
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | — |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1165 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1368 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1362 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1348 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | 1275 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1296 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1358 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1344 | 1289 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 27B better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Gemma 3 27B or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.