# Gemma 3 27B vs GPT-5.4

> GPT-5.4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 27B costs 56× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-27b-vs-gpt-5-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 29

## Summary

- They share 29 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.4 leads 73.3 to 24.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 22.5% for Gemma 3 27B and 97.8% for GPT-5.4.
- Gemma 3 27B is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $15 for GPT-5.4.
- GPT-5.4 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.5 | 59.5 |
| Rank | 277 | 14 |
| Context | 131K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.08 | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | $0.16 | $15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329)
- GPT-5.4: 52.8 (#28)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 21.2% | 56.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | 1497 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 76.9% |
| DeepSWE | — | 51.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1465 |
| GSO | — | 31.4% |
| WeirdML | — | 77.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | — |
| MirrorCode | — | 15.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,607 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.85 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105)
- GPT-5.4: 46.5 (#12)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 81.8% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 52.4% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 39.4% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 35.1% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 19% |
| GBAEval | — | 45.1% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1197 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 74.3% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,144 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297)
- GPT-5.4: 61.7 (#17)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | 63.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | 23.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 44% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | 1485 |
| DTBench | 52.5% | 94.4% |
| LMCA | 12.3% | 52% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | 156.92 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 74% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 91.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 93.7% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 16% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 80% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 25.4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 37% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.5 |
| LiveBench | 50% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261)
- GPT-5.4: 73.3 (#14)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | 97.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1488 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 78.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 49% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 83.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 56% |
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 47.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 27.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256)
- GPT-5.4: 65.3 (#13)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | 93.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | 7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1303 | 1507 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 36.2% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 45.1% |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94)
- GPT-5.4: 43.8 (#19)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1165 | 1302 |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 27.1% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 37.5% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1471 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150)
- GPT-5.4: 56.4 (#22)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1520 |
| LMArena French | 1368 | 1493 |
| LMArena German | 1362 | 1472 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | 1484 |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | 1449 |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | 1480 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1348 | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155)
- GPT-5.4: 77.3 (#25)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | 1469 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288)
- GPT-5.4: 50.3 (#8)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | 1474 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
| CL-bench | — | 27.9% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 21.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161)
- GPT-5.4: 72.1 (#18)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1358 | 1469 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | 1439 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | 1840 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1344 | 1482 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1272 |
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 27B better than GPT-5.4?

GPT-5.4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 59.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 27B costs 56× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.4's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or GPT-5.4?

Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; GPT-5.4 lists at $2.50 and $15.

### Is Gemma 3 27B or GPT-5.4 better for coding?

GPT-5.4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.8 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.4 does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and GPT-5.4 share?

29 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 has 68.