# Gemma 3 1B vs Trinity Large Thinking

> Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 40.3 to 7.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 348 | 180 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1381 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1350 |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1359 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1372 |
| LMArena French | — | 1374 |
| LMArena German | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1334 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Trinity Large Thinking?

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Trinity Large Thinking share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.