# Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 7.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 348 | 66 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 24% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1460 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.39 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1467 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena German | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1459 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.