# Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen3 32B

> Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-qwen3-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 32B leads 40.0 to 7.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 66.9% for Qwen3 32B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 348 | 166 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 37.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1358 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Qwen3 32B: 32.3 (#58)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Qwen3 32B: 19.6 (#233)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1335 |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Qwen3 32B: 37.9 (#89)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 66.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1399 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 45.8 (#162)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1311 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 69.1 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1305 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 43.7 (#83)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1327 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen3 32B: 53.1 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1331 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen3 32B?

Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3 32B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.