# Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen2-72B

> Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-qwen2-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2-72B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2-72B leads 27.9 to 9.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B and 40.8% for Qwen2-72B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 29.5 |
| Rank | 348 | 294 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 28.7 (#303)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 11.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1196 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 54% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Qwen2-72B: 16.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 1.1% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 29.9% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Qwen2-72B: 22.2 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1191 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 125.27 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Qwen2-72B: 27.9 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1235 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 39.1% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Qwen2-72B: 21.2 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 40.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | — | 82.4% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.0 (#239)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1176 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1240 |
| LMArena French | — | 1169 |
| LMArena German | — | 1151 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1111 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1168 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 62.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1181 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 36.1 (#230)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1193 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen2-72B: 41.0 (#236)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1181 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1195 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen2-72B?

Qwen2-72B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen2-72B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2-72B has 26.