# Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)

> Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#353); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-qwen2-5-coder
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | — |
| Rank | 353 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.14 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)
- Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?

Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#353); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.