# Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.6 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads 23.5 to 13.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B and 35.5% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 348 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.6 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.