# Gemma 3 1B vs Phi-1.5

> Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#348); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-phi-1-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | — |
| Rank | 348 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 90.82 |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Phi-1.5: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU | — | 37.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Phi-1.5?

Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#348); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Phi-1.5 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.