# Gemma 3 1B vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 35.0 to 7.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 348 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.1 (#186)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1292 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 24.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 33.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.0 (#178)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1294 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.3 (#226)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1241 |
| LMArena French | — | 1262 |
| LMArena German | — | 1260 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1288 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.8 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1246 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#190)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.4 (#215)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.