# Gemma 3 1B vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 24.8 to 9.6.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 32.2 |
| Rank | 348 | 248 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1210 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1208 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1208 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 78% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1186 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1199 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1221 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.