# Gemma 3 1B vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 37.7 to 7.0.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 353 | 196 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1454 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.85 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1420 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1441 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1405 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1412 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.