# Gemma 3 1B vs Llama 3.2 3B

> Llama 3.2 3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.4 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-llama-3-2-3b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.2 3B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.2 3B leads 29.1 to 7.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 7.2% for Gemma 3 1B and 21.9% for Llama 3.2 3B.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 28.4 |
| Rank | 348 | 318 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.33 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 27.1 (#314)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 23.4% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1098 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 28.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 19.9 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | 21.9% |
| BALROG | — | 10.1% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 20.1 (#225)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1095 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.9 (#213)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1126 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Llama 3.2 3B: 29.1 (#232)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1090 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 26.4 (#276)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena German | — | 1056 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 949 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 56.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1089 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 33.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1101 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Llama 3.2 3B: 24.9 (#302)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Llama 3.2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1094 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 595 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1105 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Llama 3.2 3B?

Llama 3.2 3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.4 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Llama 3.2 3B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 3B has 18.