# Gemma 3 1B vs Kimi K2.5

> Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-kimi-k2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2.5 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Kimi K2.5 leads 53.6 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 92.2% for Kimi K2.5.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 48.1 |
| Rank | 353 | 57 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.45 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 48.8 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 73.8% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 70.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1437 |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | — | 67.3% |
| SciCode | — | 49% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1474 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 821.65 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)
- Kimi K2.5: 34.2 (#48)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 43.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| OSWorld | — | 63.3% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 1,198 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)
- Kimi K2.5: 31.2 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 12% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 11.8% |
| SimpleBench | — | 46.8% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 78.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 69.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 65.3% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 3.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 69.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1453 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.03 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)
- Kimi K2.5: 51.8 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 92.2% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 62.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1470 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 27.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)
- Kimi K2.5: 53.6 (#56)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 87.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 24.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 14.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1466 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 41.1 (#39)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1430 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 53.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1433 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1495 |
| LMArena French | — | 1454 |
| LMArena German | — | 1441 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1410 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1450 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 75.3 (#64)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1431 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 52.1 (#7)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 86.1% |
| CL-bench | — | 19.3% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 13.2% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Kimi K2.5: 65.1 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Kimi K2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1423 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1444 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Kimi K2.5?

Kimi K2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Kimi K2.5 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.5 has 51.