# Gemma 3 1B vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

> Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-hunyuan-standard
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 34.2 to 7.0.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 353 | 193 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1270 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1264 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1301 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.