# Gemma 3 1B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-grok-4-20-multi-agent
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 39.7 to 7.1.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 45.5 |
| Rank | 348 | 62 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1458 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1448 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1441 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1445 |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1475 |
| LMArena French | — | 1467 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1430 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.