# Gemma 3 1B vs GLM-5.1

> GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-glm-5-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.1 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 54.9 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 93.3% for GLM-5.1.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 47.8 |
| Rank | 353 | 59 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 74.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
| SciCode | — | 43.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 57.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1485 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 887.1 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)
- GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 40.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| ExploitBench | — | 18.1% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,634 |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)
- GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 19% |
| SimpleBench | — | 55.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 77.7% |
| CritPt | — | 4.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 69.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1472 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.84 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)
- GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 36.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 67.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 22.2% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1473 |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 33.4% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 12.5% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)
- GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 89.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 34% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1476 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1515 |
| LMArena French | — | 1474 |
| LMArena German | — | 1465 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1418 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1454 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1469 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1451 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1466 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-5.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1453 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1592 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1472 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than GLM-5.1?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and GLM-5.1 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.1 has 41.