# Gemma 3 1B vs GLM-4.7-Flash

> GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-1b-vs-glm-4-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 35.5 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 353 | 180 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1383 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1356 |

## Math

- Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 58.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1355 |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314)
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 60.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1357 |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1330 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1403 |
| LMArena French | — | 1332 |
| LMArena German | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1283 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1350 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1327 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1345 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 1B: —
- GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1297 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 1B better than GLM-4.7-Flash?

GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and GLM-4.7-Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.