# Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 9.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-12b-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 26.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.7% for Gemma 3 12B and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Gemma 3 12B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.60 for Qwen3.7 Plus.
- Qwen3.7 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 45.0 |
| Rank | 255 | 66 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $1.60 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 17.4% | 45.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 24% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1460 |
| DTBench | 48.8% | 84% |
| LMCA | 4.5% | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.49 | 147.39 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 74.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |

## Math

- Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | 93.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1467 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | 87.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1467 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 12B: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1445 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | 1471 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1457 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1510 |
| LMArena French | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1411 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1453 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1439 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1454 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1459 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 12B better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 9.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.7 Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or Qwen3.7 Plus?

Gemma 3 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.60.

### Is Gemma 3 12B or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.