# Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-12b-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 26.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 16.7% for Gemma 3 12B and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.05 / $0.15 for Gemma 3 12B.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.
- Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 39.5 |
| Rank | 255 | 152 |
| Context | 131K | 1M |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $0.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 23% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.49 | 144.62 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1307 | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 12B: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | — |
| LMArena German | 1370 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | — |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 12B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Gemma 3 12B lists at $0.05 and $0.15.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.