# Gemma 3 12B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-12b-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 51.9 to 22.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is SciCode: 17.4% for Gemma 3 12B and 51.3% for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
- Gemma 3 12B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 262 | 55 |
| Context | 131K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 17.4% | 51.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1482 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.5 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1468 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1501 |
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 12B: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1434 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1409 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1511 |
| LMArena French | — | 1475 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1451 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 12B better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 2.3× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiMo-V2.6-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 3 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Flash lists at $0.14 and $0.28.

### Is Gemma 3 12B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash does, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.