# Gemma 3 12B vs Hy3

> Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/gemma-3-12b-vs-hy3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hy3 leads 40.1 to 22.3.
- Gemma 3 12B is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0825 / $0.33 for Hy3.
- Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

## Snapshot

| | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Google | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 44.2 |
| Rank | 262 | 79 |
| Context | 131K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.05 | $0.0825 |
| Output $/M | $0.15 | $0.33 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280)
- Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1464 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1508 |
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108)
- Hy3: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313)
- Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1447 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 41.2% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.5 | — |

## Math

- Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279)
- Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1475 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | — |

## Knowledge

- Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257)
- Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1460 |
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- Gemma 3 12B: —
- Hy3: —

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |

## Multilingual

- Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165)
- Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1426 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | 1439 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1432 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1493 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1456 |

## Instruction Following

- Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186)
- Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1426 |

## Long Context

- Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162)
- Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1442 |

## Writing & Preference

- Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209)
- Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hy3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Gemma 3 12B better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 12B costs 1.9× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Hy3's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B or Hy3?

Gemma 3 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.0825 and $0.33.

### Is Gemma 3 12B or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

### How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Hy3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.